Rebalancing
Key Takeaways
- Rebalancing restores a portfolio to its target asset allocation
- It enforces a systematic 'buy low, sell high' discipline
- Common approaches include calendar-based and threshold-based rebalancing
- Rebalancing maintains the intended risk level as markets move
Definition
Rebalancing is the process of buying and selling assets in a portfolio to restore it to its original target asset allocation. Over time, market movements cause a portfolio's actual allocation to drift from the target. Rebalancing sells assets that have grown beyond their target weight and buys those that have fallen below it.
For example, if you start with a 60% stocks / 40% bonds allocation and a strong stock market moves you to 70% stocks / 30% bonds, rebalancing sells stocks and buys bonds to return to 60/40. This systematically enforces a "buy low, sell high" discipline.
Rebalancing is counterintuitive because it requires selling your best-performing assets and buying your worst-performing ones. Yet this discipline prevents portfolios from becoming overly concentrated in a single asset class and maintains the risk level appropriate for your goals.
How It Works
There are two main rebalancing approaches: Calendar-based rebalancing involves checking and restoring allocations at fixed intervals — monthly, quarterly, or annually. Annual rebalancing is most common for individual investors. Threshold-based rebalancing triggers adjustments when any asset class deviates from its target by a set amount, typically 5% or more (absolute).
Rebalancing can be executed by selling overweight assets and buying underweight ones, or by directing new contributions toward underweight categories. Tax-advantaged accounts (401(k), IRA) are ideal for rebalancing because selling does not trigger capital gains taxes. In taxable accounts, tax-loss harvesting can be combined with rebalancing to offset gains.
Research shows that rebalancing frequency matters less than consistency. Annual rebalancing captures most of the benefit. More frequent rebalancing increases trading costs and taxes without significant improvement. The optimal approach depends on transaction costs, tax implications, and portfolio size.
Example
An investor starts the year with $100,000 allocated 70% stocks ($70,000) and 30% bonds ($30,000). After a strong year for stocks, the portfolio grows to $118,000 with $91,000 in stocks (77%) and $27,000 in bonds (23%). To rebalance, the investor sells $8,600 of stocks and buys $8,600 of bonds, restoring the allocation to 70/30 ($82,600 stocks / $35,400 bonds). The following year, stocks decline while bonds rise — the rebalanced portfolio outperforms because it sold stocks near the high and bought bonds before they appreciated.
Why It Matters
Rebalancing serves two critical functions: maintaining the intended risk level and systematically enforcing a contrarian discipline. Without rebalancing, a portfolio naturally becomes more aggressive after bull markets (when risk is typically elevated) and more conservative after bear markets (when future returns are typically higher). Rebalancing counteracts this.
Studies show that rebalanced portfolios have lower volatility and comparable or better returns than drifting portfolios over long periods. The benefit is primarily risk reduction — rebalancing keeps portfolios aligned with the investor's risk tolerance and prevents the disastrous outcome of being overexposed to a single asset class before a downturn.
Advantages
- Maintains the intended risk level as markets change
- Enforces a systematic buy-low, sell-high discipline
- Reduces portfolio concentration risk over time
- Can be automated through target-date funds or robo-advisors
Limitations
- Creates taxable events in non-tax-advantaged accounts
- Requires selling winners, which is psychologically difficult
- Too-frequent rebalancing increases transaction costs
- May reduce returns during extended bull markets in one asset class
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Terms
Browse more definitions in the financial terms glossary.